I.M.P.A.C.T. Church Empowerment Program

A partnership with Pastor Lee Jenkins, the Stewardship Coach, and Allan Bell - CPA, CMA, MBA, Nsites founder and creator

M6 Membership · Lesson 4 of 4

Lesson 4 — Retention, Care, and Re-engagement

Detect disengagement and respond before people silently disappear.

Not started

Nine M curriculum version 1.0 · Nine M methodology, content, exercises and deliverables by Pastor Lee Jenkins.

Where this lesson sits

Curriculum version 1.0 · Pastor Lee Review

Module purpose: Create a clear, relational pathway from first visit to belonging, covenant, retention, and active participation.

Official outcome: Visitor-to-Member Pathway

This lesson produces: Lapse Signal and Re-engagement Pathway with a monthly funnel review

Anything you type is kept in this browser session only. This prototype does not save to a server.

Learn

Participant study reading — approximately 75 minutes of learning and shared work.

Learning objective: Detect disengagement and respond before people silently disappear.

Recommended participants: Care ministry leader, small group coordinators, and a pastoral staff member

Estimated teaching time: 75 minutes

Success indicators

  • • Specific lapse signals are defined and observable
  • • A re-engagement pathway exists with named owners for each signal
  • • A monthly funnel review rhythm is established for leadership
  • • Confidentiality is protected throughout the re-engagement process

Materials and evidence you will use

  • • Stewardship Nsites Connect journey funnel data
  • • Prior lessons' journey map and follow-up standards
  • • At least three distinct lapse signals are defined with named owners
  • • A funnel review cadence and decision authority are documented

What you should be able to produce

  • • Specific lapse signals are defined and observable
  • • A re-engagement pathway exists with named owners for each signal
  • • A monthly funnel review rhythm is established for leadership
  • • Confidentiality is protected throughout the re-engagement process

Foundational ministry principle

Matthew 18:12-14

12 How think ye? if a man have an hundred sheep, and one of them be gone astray, doth he not leave the ninety and nine, and goeth into the mountains, and seeketh that which is gone astray? 13 And if so be that he find it, verily I say unto you, he rejoiceth more of that sheep, than of the ninety and nine which went not astray. 14 Even so it is not the will of your Father which is in heaven, that one of these little ones should perish.

King James Version (KJV) · Public domain

the parable of the one lost sheep suggests that noticing when even a single person drifts away matters as much as celebrating the many who remain.

Draft framing for review: leadership might consider that a re-engagement pathway is a practical expression of this parable, ensuring the church actively looks for the one who has quietly stopped coming rather than waiting to be asked.

Understand the concept

Your work in this lesson focuses on this outcome: Detect disengagement and respond before people silently disappear.

People rarely announce that they are drifting away; a church that wants to keep no one behind must build a system that notices quietly and responds warmly, on a rhythm leadership actually keeps.

Why it matters for your church

Defined lapse signals turn vague worry about disengaged members into a concrete, actionable practice.

A monthly funnel review keeps retention visible to leadership rather than only surfacing during a crisis or annual review.

Warm, low-pressure re-engagement outreach protects dignity and often surfaces real pastoral needs that would otherwise go unaddressed.

Examine the evidence

Use Stewardship Nsites Connect journey funnel data, and Prior lessons' journey map and follow-up standards to compare your church's present practice with its stated intentions. Look for documented patterns, missing information, and differences between what people assume and what the evidence supports.

Your completed work should be supported by At least three distinct lapse signals are defined with named owners, and A funnel review cadence and decision authority are documented. Record uncertainty honestly so your team knows what still needs to be verified.

Prepare for the shared exercise

Produce a working system for noticing disengagement and responding pastorally, with a recurring leadership review rhythm. The Lapse Signal and Re-engagement Design Session produces the Lapse Signal and Re-engagement Pathway with a monthly funnel review, which contributes to the module's principal deliverable.

Before working with your team, consider this reflection: Is there someone in our church right now who may already be quietly drifting, and what would it look like to reach out to them this week with warmth rather than waiting?

Key terms

Lapse signal
A specific, observable change in attendance, giving or serving pattern that indicates a person may be disengaging.
Re-engagement pathway
The defined process, including owner and message tone, used to reach out to someone showing a lapse signal.
Funnel review
A recurring leadership meeting that reviews the entire belonging journey for patterns of drop-off across every stage.

What this means for a church

  • • Defined lapse signals turn vague worry about disengaged members into a concrete, actionable practice.
  • • A monthly funnel review keeps retention visible to leadership rather than only surfacing during a crisis or annual review.
  • • Warm, low-pressure re-engagement outreach protects dignity and often surfaces real pastoral needs that would otherwise go unaddressed.

Common failure patterns

  • • Reaching out to lapsed members with guilt-laden or transactional language that pushes them further away.
  • • Defining lapse signals so broadly that ordinary seasons of life trigger unnecessary or intrusive outreach.
  • • Holding a funnel review only sporadically, so it never becomes a reliable habit that catches drift early.

Ministry case

The Family No One Called

A family that had served faithfully for years began attending less and less after a difficult season, eventually stopping altogether. No formal system existed to notice the pattern, and by the time a friend happened to mention their absence eight months later, the family had already settled into not attending anywhere.

In the aftermath, leadership realized that had a lapse signal existed for four consecutive missed Sundays, someone would have reached out within weeks rather than learning about the absence by accident nearly a year later. This case became the direct catalyst for building the re-engagement pathway described in this lesson.

Lesson takeaway

People rarely announce that they are drifting away; a church that wants to keep no one behind must build a system that notices quietly and responds warmly, on a rhythm leadership actually keeps.

Discuss

Guided discussion for the leadership table.

Having practiced the tone of a re-engagement message and named current examples in our own congregation, let us finalize the Lapse Signal and Re-engagement Pathway and set our first monthly funnel review date in the exercise.

  1. Can we name someone right now who may already be showing a lapse signal, and what would a warm check-in to them sound like?
  2. What data do we currently have access to that could help us notice disengagement earlier?
  3. Who should be in the room for our monthly funnel review, and what decisions should they be able to make there?
  4. How do we make sure re-engagement outreach never feels like guilt or solicitation?

Practice

Applied exercise — produces the Lapse Signal and Re-engagement Pathway with a monthly funnel review.

Lapse Signal and Re-engagement Design Session

Produce a working system for noticing disengagement and responding pastorally, with a recurring leadership review rhythm.

Estimated time: 40 minutes

Participants: Care ministry leader, small group coordinators and pastoral staff in small groups

Artifact produced: Lapse Signal and Re-engagement Pathway with a monthly funnel review

Required inputs

  • • Recent attendance, giving or small group participation patterns
  • • Stewardship Nsites Connect journey funnel data
  • • Prior examples of members who disengaged without follow-up

Instructions

  1. List the specific lapse signals your church will watch for.
  2. For each signal, name who is responsible for reaching out.
  3. Draft the warm, low-pressure message or approach used for that outreach.
  4. Note how confidentiality will be protected during the outreach and any resulting conversation.
  5. Decide the cadence and attendees for the monthly funnel review.
  6. List what data will be brought to each funnel review.
  7. Identify one decision the funnel review team is authorized to make immediately when a pattern is found.
Complete it online

Lapse Signal and Re-engagement Pathway

  • Church name: ______________________
  • Date completed: ______________________
  • Facilitator: ______________________
Lapse signalOwnerOutreach approachConfidentiality noteFunnel review cadenceData source
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      

Worked example

A fully completed sample using a fictional church. This is illustrative teaching material, not any church's actual data.

Northgate Community Church (illustrative example — not actual church data)

Northgate builds its retention system directly in response to the family that quietly disengaged for eight months before anyone noticed.

Lapse signalOwnerOutreach approachConfidentiality noteFunnel review cadenceData source
Four consecutive missed SundaysSmall group leaderA warm personal text saying they were missed, with no mention of attendance countShared only with the care ministry leader if a need is disclosedMonthly, first TuesdayNsites Connect attendance pattern view
Three consecutive missed small group meetingsSmall group leaderA personal phone call checking in on wellbeingKept within the small group leadership team unless a pastoral referral is neededMonthly, first TuesdaySmall group attendance log
Giving pattern stops without explanationStewardship coordinator, in partnership with a pastorA wellbeing check-in call, with no mention of giving at allGiving data is discussed only between the two named rolesMonthly, first TuesdayGiving records, viewed only by authorized stewardship staff
Volunteer steps back from serving without explanationMinistry team leaderA conversation offering thanks and asking how the person is doingShared only if the person consents to further pastoral follow-upMonthly, first TuesdayServing schedule records

How this leadership team reasoned

  • • Leadership decided giving-related outreach must never mention money directly, since the earlier family case had involved a season of hardship they were embarrassed to discuss.
  • • They agreed small group leaders were the most natural and least intrusive first point of contact for most lapse signals.
  • • The monthly funnel review was placed on the first Tuesday, aligned with the existing leadership meeting, to ensure it would actually happen.

Decisions recorded

  • • Route all giving-related lapse signals through the stewardship coordinator and a pastor jointly, never a general volunteer.
  • • Hold the first funnel review within 30 days, using Nsites Connect attendance and small group data as the primary sources.
  • • Authorize the funnel review team to immediately assign a care contact for any name that appears in two or more lapse categories at once.

Completed artifact extract — Lapse Signal and Re-engagement Pathway with a monthly funnel review

Northgate Community Church Lapse Signal and Re-engagement Pathway: any member missing four consecutive Sundays receives a warm personal text from their small group leader within one week, with no reference to attendance count; the monthly funnel review, held the first Tuesday of each month, reviews Nsites Connect attendance and small group data to identify emerging patterns...

Illustrative exercise score: 18 of 20. The pathway defined specific, humane signals and owners, protected confidentiality thoughtfully, and embedded the review into an existing meeting rhythm, though the escalation criteria for members appearing in multiple categories could be defined slightly further.

Score

Transparent 20-point exercise rubric: four criteria rated 0 to 5 with observable anchors.

Criterion0 — not evident3 — acceptable5 — exemplarySample
Completeness (0–5)No lapse signals, owners or review rhythm are defined.Some signals are defined but the funnel review rhythm or data sources are missing.All lapse signals, owners, outreach approaches and a funnel review cadence with data sources are fully defined.5
Use of evidence (0–5)Signals are chosen arbitrarily with no connection to real church experience.Some signals reference past experience but data sources for tracking are vague.Signals and review data sources are directly grounded in a real prior gap and available tracking systems.5
Alignment to the module purpose (0–5)The pathway is disconnected from the broader belonging journey and pathway deliverable.The pathway addresses disengagement but does not connect back to earlier journey stages.The pathway completes the full arc of the Visitor-to-Member Pathway, closing the loop from active participation back to care.5
Actionability and ownership (0–5)No owner or decision authority is defined for any lapse signal.Owners are named but the funnel review has no clear decision authority.Every signal has a named owner and the funnel review team has explicit authority to act immediately on findings.4
Worked sample total19 / 20
  • Completeness: Northgate defined four clear lapse signals with owners, outreach approaches, confidentiality notes and a review cadence.
  • Use of evidence: Signals were directly shaped by the family case study and tied to specific, real data sources including Nsites Connect views.
  • Alignment to the module purpose: The pathway explicitly closed the loop on the journey map from Lesson One, completing the module's principal deliverable.
  • Actionability and ownership: Owners were clearly named and the review team was given decision authority, though the multi-category escalation trigger needs slightly more precision.

Lesson-exercise scores (20 points each) demonstrate learning and artifact quality. They do not automatically overwrite the official Nine M module assessment, which remains a separate 100-point rating of five module dimensions.

Submit evidence

What must be submitted for this lesson to count as complete.

Submit

  • • Completed Lapse Signal and Re-engagement Pathway worksheet
  • • Scheduled date and attendee list for the first monthly funnel review

Attach this evidence

  • At least three distinct lapse signals are defined with named owners
  • A funnel review cadence and decision authority are documented

File upload is not implemented in this prototype. Ticking a box records that the church can produce the document; it does not store a file.

Contribute to official outcome

How this lesson builds the Visitor-to-Member Pathway.

Artifact produced: Lapse Signal and Re-engagement Pathway with a monthly funnel review

Completes the Visitor-to-Member Pathway with retention measures and feeds the module's gap list and 90-day action plan.

Open the module deliverable assembly

Participant reflection and notes

Is there someone in our church right now who may already be quietly drifting, and what would it look like to reach out to them this week with warmth rather than waiting?