I.M.P.A.C.T. Church Empowerment Program

A partnership with Pastor Lee Jenkins, the Stewardship Coach, and Allan Bell - CPA, CMA, MBA, Nsites founder and creator

M4 Marketing · Lesson 4 of 4

Lesson 4 — Measuring Awareness and Response

Connect communication activity to visits, engagement and mission outcomes, and produce a Campaign Measurement Plan with visitor-source attribution and conversion stages.

Not started

Nine M curriculum version 1.0 · Nine M methodology, content, exercises and deliverables by Pastor Lee Jenkins.

Where this lesson sits

Curriculum version 1.0 · Pastor Lee Review

Module purpose: Align the church's public identity, message, digital presence, communications, and community awareness with its mission.

Official outcome: Church Marketing and Communications Plan

This lesson produces: Campaign Measurement Plan with visitor-source attribution categories and conversion stages

Anything you type is kept in this browser session only. This prototype does not save to a server.

Learn

Participant study reading — approximately 60 minutes of learning and shared work.

Learning objective: Connect communication activity to visits, engagement and mission outcomes, and produce a Campaign Measurement Plan with visitor-source attribution and conversion stages.

Recommended participants: Senior leadership, communications lead, guest services or connections team lead

Estimated teaching time: 60 minutes

Success indicators

  • • Leadership can name how a recent visitor most likely first heard about the church
  • • A Campaign Measurement Plan defines clear visitor-source attribution categories
  • • Conversion stages are defined from first awareness through to ongoing engagement
  • • A review rhythm is established for comparing communication activity against actual outcomes

Materials and evidence you will use

  • • Recent visitor or guest cards, if collected
  • • The four-week Content Calendar from lesson three
  • • Any existing attendance or engagement records
  • • Defined visitor-source categories and conversion stages
  • • Named owners and a scheduled review rhythm

What you should be able to produce

  • • Leadership can name how a recent visitor most likely first heard about the church
  • • A Campaign Measurement Plan defines clear visitor-source attribution categories
  • • Conversion stages are defined from first awareness through to ongoing engagement
  • • A review rhythm is established for comparing communication activity against actual outcomes

Foundational ministry principle

Luke 15:8-10

8 Either what woman having ten pieces of silver, if she lose one piece, doth not light a candle, and sweep the house, and seek diligently till she find it? 9 And when she hath found it, she calleth her friends and her neighbours together, saying, Rejoice with me; for I have found the piece which I had lost. 10 Likewise, I say unto you, there is joy in the presence of the angels of God over one sinner that repenteth.

King James Version (KJV) · Public domain

The woman who loses a coin lights a lamp, sweeps the house and searches carefully until she finds it, then calls her friends together to celebrate.

As a draft connection for review, this passage frames measurement as careful, attentive searching rather than passive hoping: the church that wants to know whether its invitation is reaching people must look diligently for evidence, and celebrate specifically when it finds that someone responded.

Understand the concept

Your work in this lesson focuses on this outcome: Connect communication activity to visits, engagement and mission outcomes, and produce a Campaign Measurement Plan with visitor-source attribution and conversion stages.

Marketing without measurement is a guess dressed up as a strategy; a simple, consistent habit of asking and recording turns that guess into wisdom the church can act on.

Why it matters for your church

Guest services or connections volunteers need a simple, consistent way to ask and record how guests heard about the church.

Leadership needs a standing time on the calendar to review measurement data after each major communication push.

Some communication efforts may need to be scaled back or redirected once the data shows where people actually get stuck.

Examine the evidence

Use Recent visitor or guest cards, if collected, The four-week Content Calendar from lesson three, and Any existing attendance or engagement records to compare your church's present practice with its stated intentions. Look for documented patterns, missing information, and differences between what people assume and what the evidence supports.

Your completed work should be supported by Defined visitor-source categories and conversion stages, and Named owners and a scheduled review rhythm. Record uncertainty honestly so your team knows what still needs to be verified.

Prepare for the shared exercise

Define how the church will track visitor sources and conversion stages, and establish a review rhythm connecting communication activity to actual outcomes. The Campaign Measurement Plan produces the Campaign Measurement Plan with visitor-source attribution categories and conversion stages, which contributes to the module's principal deliverable.

Before working with your team, consider this reflection: If we tracked this data faithfully for the next quarter, what do we genuinely expect it would reveal about our church's invitation?

Key terms

Visitor-source attribution
The practice of recording how a first-time guest first heard about or decided to visit the church.
Conversion stages
The defined sequence of steps a person moves through from first awareness of the church to ongoing, engaged participation.
Campaign Measurement Plan
A document defining visitor-source categories, conversion stages and a review rhythm for evaluating communication activity against actual outcomes.

What this means for a church

  • • Guest services or connections volunteers need a simple, consistent way to ask and record how guests heard about the church
  • • Leadership needs a standing time on the calendar to review measurement data after each major communication push
  • • Some communication efforts may need to be scaled back or redirected once the data shows where people actually get stuck

Common failure patterns

  • • Collecting visitor-source information inconsistently so the data cannot be trusted or compared over time
  • • Measuring only initial visits and never tracking whether people return or take a next step
  • • Gathering data but never actually reviewing it as a team before planning the next communication push

Ministry case

The Campaign That Looked Successful and Wasn't

A church ran a well-produced community outreach campaign and celebrated a strong turnout on the day of the event. Because no one had asked attendees how they heard about it, leadership assumed the social media campaign had driven the turnout and planned to repeat the same approach the following quarter.

After adopting simple visitor-source questions the following season, the team discovered that nearly all new attendees had actually come through personal invitations from members, not the social campaign at all. The following quarter, they redirected their energy toward equipping members to invite people directly, and attendance from genuinely new community members increased, while the social media budget was redirected toward supporting that member-invitation effort instead.

Lesson takeaway

Marketing without measurement is a guess dressed up as a strategy; a simple, consistent habit of asking and recording turns that guess into wisdom the church can act on.

Discuss

Guided discussion for the leadership table.

With this honest look at what we do and don't currently know, let's build the measurement plan that will let us answer these questions with confidence going forward.

  1. How confident are we, honestly, in explaining why our last visitor came?
  2. Where in our current process would visitor-source questions fit most naturally?
  3. At which conversion stage do we suspect the most people are getting stuck?
  4. Who will own reviewing this data after each major communication push?

Practice

Applied exercise — produces the Campaign Measurement Plan with visitor-source attribution categories and conversion stages.

Campaign Measurement Plan

Define how the church will track visitor sources and conversion stages, and establish a review rhythm connecting communication activity to actual outcomes.

Estimated time: 30 minutes

Participants: Senior leadership, communications lead, guest services or connections team lead

Artifact produced: Campaign Measurement Plan with visitor-source attribution categories and conversion stages

Required inputs

  • • Recent visitor or guest cards, if available
  • • The four-week Content Calendar from lesson three

Instructions

  1. Define four to six visitor-source attribution categories the church can realistically and consistently track
  2. Decide where and how the visitor-source question will be asked and by whom
  3. Define the conversion stages from first awareness through to ongoing engagement
  4. For each item on the Content Calendar, name the specific outcome that would indicate success
  5. Identify where the church suspects people are currently getting stuck between stages
  6. Set a review rhythm naming who reviews the data, how often, and what happens with what is learned
Complete it online

Campaign Measurement Plan Worksheet

  • Church name: ______________________
  • Plan period: ______________________
  • Prepared by: ______________________
Conversion stageDefinitionVisitor-source categories trackedData collection methodOwnerReview frequency
      
      
      
      
      
      
      
      

Worked example

A fully completed sample using a fictional church. This is illustrative teaching material, not any church's actual data.

Northgate Community Church (illustrative example — not actual church data)

Northgate built its first Campaign Measurement Plan following the four-week Content Calendar from the food drive and weekly groups launch.

Conversion stageDefinitionVisitor-source categories trackedData collection methodOwnerReview frequency
AwarePerson has encountered church name or message but has not visitedOnline, invited by friend, saw event flyer, drove past buildingInformal tracking through social engagement and community conversationsCommunications volunteerMonthly
Visited oncePerson attended a service or event for the first timeSame categories, asked directly on guest cardGuest card question at first-time guest tableGuest services leadWeekly after each Sunday
Returned within a monthPerson attended a second time within four weeks of first visitN/A, tracked by name from guest cardFollow-up check by connections volunteerConnections volunteerMonthly
EngagedPerson joined a weekly group or began serving on a teamN/A, tracked by name from group and volunteer signupsWeekly groups coordinator's signup listWeekly groups coordinatorMonthly

How this leadership team reasoned

  • • The team chose categories simple enough for a busy guest services volunteer to ask consistently without feeling intrusive
  • • They recognized their biggest unknown was the gap between first visit and return, so they assigned a specific volunteer to follow up personally
  • • They set a monthly review so the data would be current enough to inform the next content calendar cycle

Decisions recorded

  • • Adopted five visitor-source categories: invited by friend, found online, saw event flyer, walked in, returning after time away
  • • Assigned the guest services lead to ask the visitor-source question at every first-time guest interaction
  • • Scheduled a standing monthly quarter-hour review meeting to compare content calendar outcomes against actual attendance and engagement data

Completed artifact extract — Campaign Measurement Plan with visitor-source attribution categories and conversion stages

Campaign Measurement Plan — Northgate Community Church Stage 1, Aware: tracked informally through social engagement, reviewed monthly. Stage 2, Visited once: tracked via guest card question at first-time guest table, reviewed weekly. Stage 3, Returned within a month: tracked via connections volunteer follow-up, reviewed monthly. Stage 4, Engaged: tracked via weekly groups and volunteer signups, reviewed monthly. Visitor-source categories: invited by friend, found online, saw event flyer, walked in, returning after time away. Standing review: monthly quarter-hour leadership review comparing content calendar outcomes against attendance and engagement data.

Illustrative exercise score: 17 of 20. The plan defines clear stages, realistic categories and named owners with a consistent review rhythm, though the 'aware' stage measurement method remains the least precise of the four stages.

Score

Transparent 20-point exercise rubric: four criteria rated 0 to 5 with observable anchors.

Criterion0 — not evident3 — acceptable5 — exemplarySample
Completeness (0–5)No conversion stages or visitor-source categories are definedConversion stages are defined but visitor-source categories or data collection methods are missingAll conversion stages, visitor-source categories, data collection methods, owners and review frequency are fully defined5
Use of evidence (0–5)The plan is disconnected from the actual Content Calendar and guest data collected in earlier lessonsThe plan references the Content Calendar generally but does not tie specific items to specific outcomesThe plan clearly ties conversion stages and data collection to the specific Content Calendar items and guest card data from earlier lessons4
Alignment to the module purpose (0–5)The plan treats measurement as a numbers exercise disconnected from the church's mission of engagement and belongingThe plan tracks numbers but does not connect them to identifying where people get stuck in belonging to the churchThe plan explicitly identifies where people are likely getting stuck between awareness and engagement, connecting data to mission stewardship4
Actionability and ownership (0–5)No owners or review rhythm are establishedOwners are named but no standing review rhythm is scheduledEvery stage has a named owner and a standing review rhythm is scheduled with a clear cadence4
Worked sample total17 / 20
  • Completeness: Northgate completed all four stages with categories, methods, owners and frequency filled in.
  • Use of evidence: The plan is well connected to the guest card process and calendar outcomes, though the aware stage lacks a concrete data source.
  • Alignment to the module purpose: The team explicitly identified the gap between first visit and return as their key concern, directly serving the module's mission focus.
  • Actionability and ownership: Each stage has a named owner and a monthly or weekly review cadence, though the follow-up process for the 'returned' stage could specify exact timing more precisely.

Lesson-exercise scores (20 points each) demonstrate learning and artifact quality. They do not automatically overwrite the official Nine M module assessment, which remains a separate 100-point rating of five module dimensions.

Submit evidence

What must be submitted for this lesson to count as complete.

Submit

  • • Completed Campaign Measurement Plan worksheet

Attach this evidence

  • Defined visitor-source categories and conversion stages
  • Named owners and a scheduled review rhythm

File upload is not implemented in this prototype. Ticking a box records that the church can produce the document; it does not store a file.

Contribute to official outcome

How this lesson builds the Church Marketing and Communications Plan.

Artifact produced: Campaign Measurement Plan with visitor-source attribution categories and conversion stages

Forms the measurement section of the Church Marketing and Communications Plan, closing the loop between communication activity and mission outcomes, and completes the plan alongside the 90-day action plan.

Open the module deliverable assembly

Participant reflection and notes

If we tracked this data faithfully for the next quarter, what do we genuinely expect it would reveal about our church's invitation?