M7 Maturity · Lesson 4 of 4

Lesson 4 — Building a Culture of Ongoing Formation

Integrate formation practices into preaching, groups, households, care, leadership, and service so growth becomes a rhythm rather than a program.

Not started

M7 Lesson 3 Back to M7 Maturity M8 Lesson 1

Nine M curriculum version 1.0 · Nine M methodology, content, exercises and deliverables by Pastor Lee Jenkins.

Where this lesson sits

Curriculum version 1.0 · Pastor Lee Review

Module purpose: Establish a visible discipleship and spiritual-formation pathway that helps people understand their next step and demonstrates growth without reducing spiritual maturity to attendance alone.

Official outcome: Discipleship and Maturity Pathway

This lesson produces: Twelve-Month Formation Rhythm

Anything you type is kept in this browser session only. This prototype does not save to a server.

Learn

Participant study reading — approximately 60 minutes of learning and shared work.

Learning objective: Integrate formation practices into preaching, groups, households, care, leadership, and service so growth becomes a rhythm rather than a program.

Recommended participants: Pastoral staff, ministry leaders, and leadership-pipeline coordinators

Estimated teaching time: 60 minutes

Success indicators

• Leaders can name specific integration points across preaching, groups, households, care, leadership, and service
• A completed Twelve-Month Formation Rhythm names concrete activities across the year
• The rhythm assigns improvements to the three largest pathway gaps identified in Lesson 2
• Leaders can describe how the leader-development bridge connects to the pathway

Materials and evidence you will use

• Formation Environment Inventory and Pathway Map from Lesson 2
• Quarterly Maturity Dashboard from Lesson 3
• Existing preaching calendar and leadership-development notes
• Three gaps assigned to specific quarters
• A named owner and success measure for each improvement

What you should be able to produce

• Leaders can name specific integration points across preaching, groups, households, care, leadership, and service
• A completed Twelve-Month Formation Rhythm names concrete activities across the year
• The rhythm assigns improvements to the three largest pathway gaps identified in Lesson 2
• Leaders can describe how the leader-development bridge connects to the pathway

Foundational ministry principle

2 Timothy 2:2

2 And the things that thou hast heard of me among many witnesses, the same commit thou to faithful men, who shall be able to teach others also.

King James Version (KJV) · Public domain

Paul instructs Timothy to entrust what he has learned to faithful people who will be able to teach others also, describing a multiplying chain of formation across generations. As draft language proposed for Pastor Lee Jenkins' review, this lens frames formation as something woven through ongoing relationships, not confined to a single class.

As a proposed connection for Pastor Lee's review, this passage suggests our Twelve-Month Formation Rhythm should be built so growth is reinforced continually through preaching, groups, households, care, leadership, and service, each handing off to the next rather than formation living inside one isolated program.

Understand the concept

Your work in this lesson focuses on this outcome: Integrate formation practices into preaching, groups, households, care, leadership, and service so growth becomes a rhythm rather than a program.

A discipleship pathway only becomes a culture when formation is woven into the ordinary rhythms of preaching, groups, households, care, leadership, and service, with the biggest gaps given a realistic, owned plan across the coming year.

Why it matters for your church

Formation becomes visible across the whole church calendar rather than confined to a single class or program.

Leadership development becomes a visible, intentional extension of the discipleship pathway rather than a separate track.

The three largest pathway gaps receive a realistic, owned plan rather than remaining a vague aspiration.

Examine the evidence

Use Formation Environment Inventory and Pathway Map from Lesson 2, Quarterly Maturity Dashboard from Lesson 3, and Existing preaching calendar and leadership-development notes to compare your church's present practice with its stated intentions. Look for documented patterns, missing information, and differences between what people assume and what the evidence supports.

Your completed work should be supported by Three gaps assigned to specific quarters, and A named owner and success measure for each improvement. Record uncertainty honestly so your team knows what still needs to be verified.

Prepare for the shared exercise

Assign specific formation improvements, tied to the pathway's three largest gaps, across quarters and integration points. The Building the Twelve-Month Formation Rhythm produces the Twelve-Month Formation Rhythm, which contributes to the module's principal deliverable.

Before working with your team, consider this reflection: Picture this time next year. What is one specific, small sign that would tell you formation had become a genuine rhythm here rather than a single program?

Key terms

Integration Point: A specific area of church life, such as preaching, groups, households, care, leadership, or service, where formation can be intentionally woven in rather than isolated.
Leader-Development Bridge: The named, intentional transition point where a maturing disciple is invited into a leadership role, defined by specific criteria and a responsible person.
Twelve-Month Formation Rhythm: A year-long plan assigning specific formation improvements, tied to the pathway's largest named gaps, across quarters and integration points.

What this means for a church

• Formation becomes visible across the whole church calendar rather than confined to a single class or program
• Leadership development becomes a visible, intentional extension of the discipleship pathway rather than a separate track
• The three largest pathway gaps receive a realistic, owned plan rather than remaining a vague aspiration

Common failure patterns

• Building an aspirational rhythm with no connection to the specific gaps already identified
• Assigning every integration point to the same one or two overloaded staff members
• Treating this lesson's rhythm as a finished plan rather than bringing it to Pastor Lee Jenkins for review

Ministry case

The Leadership Pipeline That Had No Front Door

A growing congregation realized during their leader-development bridge discussion that their leadership team had, for years, recruited new small-group leaders almost entirely from among people who happened to already be close friends with an existing leader. Capable, maturing disciples outside that friend circle were essentially invisible to the pipeline, no matter how ready they were.

Once they defined specific Maturity Profile criteria for readiness and named the discipleship pastor as the person responsible for actively watching for and inviting new leaders, they identified three people within the first quarter who had been serving faithfully for years without ever being asked. Two accepted the invitation to lead a group within two months of the bridge being formalized.

Lesson takeaway

Discuss

Guided discussion for the leadership table.

Look at the three gaps your table assigned to quarters. Talk through what would have to be true for each assigned owner to actually follow through.

Which of the six integration points feels most naturally already in motion at our church, and which feels most neglected?
How does someone currently move from being a maturing disciple to being invited into leadership here?
Of the three gaps you assigned to quarters, which one are you most confident will actually happen, and why?
What would need to be true a year from now for you to say this rhythm genuinely became a culture?

Discussion notes

Practice

Applied exercise — produces the Twelve-Month Formation Rhythm.

Building the Twelve-Month Formation Rhythm

Assign specific formation improvements, tied to the pathway's three largest gaps, across quarters and integration points.

Estimated time: 30 minutes

Participants: Full leadership group working together or in two larger teams

Artifact produced: Twelve-Month Formation Rhythm

Required inputs

• Pathway Map and named gaps from Lesson 2
• Quarterly Maturity Dashboard from Lesson 3
• Preaching or teaching calendar if available

Instructions

Revisit the gaps named in Lesson 2 and select the three largest.
For each gap, choose the integration point, preaching, groups, households, care, leadership, or service, best suited to address it.
Assign each gap to a specific quarter across the coming year.
Name a specific owner responsible for that quarter's improvement.
Write one observable success measure for each improvement.
Confirm the leader-development bridge is named somewhere in the rhythm.

Complete it online

Twelve-Month Formation Rhythm

Prepared for pastoral review: ______________________
Date completed: ______________________

Gap Addressed	Integration Point	Quarter	Owner	Success Measure

Your response — Twelve-Month Formation Rhythm

Worked example

A fully completed sample using a fictional church. This is illustrative teaching material, not any church's actual data.

Northgate Community Church (illustrative example — not actual church data)

Northgate's leadership team built their Twelve-Month Formation Rhythm around the three largest gaps identified in their earlier Pathway Map work.

Gap Addressed	Integration Point	Quarter	Owner	Success Measure
No visible mentoring on-ramp for maturing disciples	Leadership	Quarter 1	Discipleship pastor	A public sign-up path for mentoring exists and at least five new pairs are formed
Households have no simple shared formation practice	Households	Quarter 2	Family ministry director	A simple one-page family devotion guide is distributed and used by at least twenty households
Leadership pipeline recruits only from existing friend circles	Leadership	Quarter 3	Discipleship pastor and elder board	Three new leaders are identified using Maturity Profile criteria and personally invited

How this leadership team reasoned

• The team deliberately limited the rhythm to three gaps rather than trying to fix everything discovered in the earlier inventory at once.
• They matched each gap to the integration point best positioned to realistically address it given current staffing.
• They wrote success measures specific enough to know clearly whether the improvement actually happened, not just whether effort was spent.

Decisions recorded

• Sequenced the mentoring on-ramp first since it addressed the most urgent gap from Lesson 2.
• Assigned named individual owners rather than entire ministry teams, to ensure accountability.
• Committed to bringing the full Twelve-Month Formation Rhythm to Pastor Lee Jenkins for review before publicly announcing any of it.

Completed artifact extract — Twelve-Month Formation Rhythm

Twelve-Month Formation Rhythm (Draft): Northgate commits its first year of pathway improvement to three specific, owned changes, a visible mentoring on-ramp, a household devotion practice, and a broadened leadership pipeline, each with a named quarter, owner, and success measure.

Illustrative exercise score: 18 of 20. The rhythm is complete, directly tied to gaps already identified with evidence in Lesson 2, tightly aligned to the module's purpose of building an ongoing culture rather than a single program, and each improvement has a clear, actionable owner.

Score

Transparent 20-point exercise rubric: four criteria rated 0 to 5 with observable anchors.

Criterion	0 — not evident	3 — acceptable	5 — exemplary	Sample
Completeness (0–5)	No gaps or quarters were assigned.	Some gaps are assigned to quarters but owners or success measures are missing.	All three gaps are assigned to quarters with full owner and success-measure detail.	5
Use of evidence (0–5)	Gaps chosen are not connected to any prior inventory or dashboard work.	Gaps are loosely connected to prior work but not clearly the largest ones identified.	Gaps are directly drawn from the largest, most specific gaps named in Lesson 2.	5
Alignment to the module purpose (0–5)	The rhythm treats formation as a single isolated program rather than a culture.	The rhythm touches a couple of integration points but not a real spread across church life.	The rhythm spans multiple integration points and clearly reflects an intent to build ongoing culture.	4
Actionability and ownership (0–5)	No individual owners or measures are named.	Owners are named but success measures are vague.	Specific owners and observable success measures are named for every improvement.	4
Worked sample total				18 / 20

Completeness: Northgate completed all fields for all three selected gaps.
Use of evidence: All three gaps trace directly back to specific findings from the Pathway Map exercise.
Alignment to the module purpose: The rhythm spans leadership and households meaningfully, though preaching integration was not yet included this year.
Actionability and ownership: Each improvement has a named owner and a specific, observable success measure.

Lesson-exercise scores (20 points each) demonstrate learning and artifact quality. They do not automatically overwrite the official Nine M module assessment, which remains a separate 100-point rating of five module dimensions.

Submit evidence

What must be submitted for this lesson to count as complete.

Submit

• A completed Twelve-Month Formation Rhythm worksheet
• Confirmation the rhythm will be brought to Pastor Lee Jenkins for review

Attach this evidence

Three gaps assigned to specific quarters
A named owner and success measure for each improvement

File upload is not implemented in this prototype. Ticking a box records that the church can produce the document; it does not store a file.

Contribute to official outcome

How this lesson builds the Discipleship and Maturity Pathway.

Artifact produced: Twelve-Month Formation Rhythm

Becomes the leadership-and-cultural-integration section of the Discipleship and Maturity Pathway and supplies the module's 90-day action plan with its first-quarter priorities.

Open the module deliverable assembly

Participant reflection and notes

Picture this time next year. What is one specific, small sign that would tell you formation had become a genuine rhythm here rather than a single program?

M7 Lesson 3 Back to M7 Maturity M8 Lesson 1