I.M.P.A.C.T. Church Empowerment Program

A partnership with Pastor Lee Jenkins, the Stewardship Coach, and Allan Bell - CPA, CMA, MBA, Nsites founder and creator

M3 Money · Lesson 1 of 4

Lesson 1 — Stewardship and Financial Visibility

Identify the financial information leaders need to make timely, mission-aligned decisions.

Not started

Nine M curriculum version 1.0 · Nine M methodology, content, exercises and deliverables by Pastor Lee Jenkins.

Where this lesson sits

Curriculum version 1.0 · Pastor Lee Review

Module purpose: Strengthen stewardship, financial visibility, giving, budgeting, cash flow, controls, reserves, and long-term sustainability.

Official outcome: Church Financial Health and Stewardship Plan

This lesson produces: Ten Financial Questions Visibility Test

Anything you type is kept in this browser session only. This prototype does not save to a server.

Learn

Participant study reading — approximately 75 minutes of learning and shared work.

Learning objective: Identify the financial information leaders need to make timely, mission-aligned decisions.

Recommended participants: Pastor, treasurer, finance committee, and one or two board members

Estimated teaching time: 75 minutes

Success indicators

  • • Leadership can list the ten financial questions a healthy governing body should be able to answer at any time
  • • The team has identified which of the ten questions it can currently answer with confidence and which it cannot
  • • A named owner exists for closing each visibility gap discovered
  • • Leadership can explain, in plain language, where each figure in the scorecard comes from in Stewardship Nsites

Materials and evidence you will use

  • • Stewardship Nsites financial dashboard export
  • • Most recent bank reconciliation
  • • Prior-year annual financial summary, if available
  • • Consensus scores for all ten questions
  • • At least two access or habit changes committed to in writing

What you should be able to produce

  • • Leadership can list the ten financial questions a healthy governing body should be able to answer at any time
  • • The team has identified which of the ten questions it can currently answer with confidence and which it cannot
  • • A named owner exists for closing each visibility gap discovered
  • • Leadership can explain, in plain language, where each figure in the scorecard comes from in Stewardship Nsites

Foundational ministry principle

Luke 16:10-12

10 He that is faithful in that which is least is faithful also in much: and he that is unjust in the least is unjust also in much. 11 If therefore ye have not been faithful in the unrighteous mammon, who will commit to your trust the true riches? 12 And if ye have not been faithful in that which is another man’s, who shall give you that which is your own?

King James Version (KJV) · Public domain

This passage is proposed for the lesson opening because it connects trustworthiness in small financial matters to being entrusted with greater responsibility, a theme directly relevant to financial visibility.

As a draft framing, the facilitator might suggest that visibility is not about suspicion but about faithfulness: a church cannot be found trustworthy with what it cannot see clearly, pending Pastor Lee Jenkins' review of this specific application.

Understand the concept

Your work in this lesson focuses on this outcome: Identify the financial information leaders need to make timely, mission-aligned decisions.

A church cannot steward what it cannot see; today's Ten Financial Questions Visibility Test names the gaps that the rest of this module will work to close.

Why it matters for your church

Leadership decisions about staffing or new ministry launches are often made without knowing the true cash position, creating avoidable risk.

When only one person can answer financial questions, that person becomes a single point of failure and an unintended gatekeeper.

Boards that cannot answer basic financial questions struggle to fulfill their fiduciary responsibility to the congregation.

Examine the evidence

Use Stewardship Nsites financial dashboard export, Most recent bank reconciliation, and Prior-year annual financial summary, if available to compare your church's present practice with its stated intentions. Look for documented patterns, missing information, and differences between what people assume and what the evidence supports.

Your completed work should be supported by Consensus scores for all ten questions, and At least two access or habit changes committed to in writing. Record uncertainty honestly so your team knows what still needs to be verified.

Prepare for the shared exercise

Establish an honest baseline of what leadership currently can and cannot answer about the church's finances, and assign ownership for closing each gap. The Ten Financial Questions Visibility Test produces the Ten Financial Questions Visibility Test, which contributes to the module's principal deliverable.

Before working with your team, consider this reflection: Which financial question, if I could answer it confidently tomorrow, would change a decision I am currently avoiding?

Key terms

Financial visibility
The degree to which accurate, timely financial information reaches the people responsible for making decisions, not just the person who keeps the books.
Operating runway
The number of months a church could continue paying its normal operating expenses if income stopped, based on current cash and reserves.
Reconciliation
The process of matching recorded financial transactions against bank statements to confirm the books are accurate.

What this means for a church

  • • Leadership decisions about staffing or new ministry launches are often made without knowing the true cash position, creating avoidable risk
  • • When only one person can answer financial questions, that person becomes a single point of failure and an unintended gatekeeper
  • • Boards that cannot answer basic financial questions struggle to fulfill their fiduciary responsibility to the congregation

Common failure patterns

  • • Treating the treasurer's monthly report as the full extent of financial visibility rather than a starting point for discussion
  • • Assuming that because the books are technically accurate, leadership therefore has adequate visibility into them
  • • Avoiding financial questions in board meetings because no one wants to appear to be questioning the bookkeeper's integrity

Ministry case

A Board That Could Not Answer Its Own Question

A midsize congregation's board was asked during a budget meeting how many months of operating expenses they could cover if giving dropped sharply. No one in the room could answer, including the treasurer, because the reserve funds were spread across two accounts that had never been added together in a single report.

It took less than a week to produce the answer once someone was assigned to pull both account balances from Stewardship Nsites and compare them to average monthly expenses, but the deeper lesson for that board was that the information had been available the whole time, it simply had never been assembled into a form anyone could use for a decision.

Lesson takeaway

A church cannot steward what it cannot see; today's Ten Financial Questions Visibility Test names the gaps that the rest of this module will work to close.

Discuss

Guided discussion for the leadership table.

Having named where visibility is strong and where it is thin, let's talk together about what it will actually take to close the most urgent gaps before the next lesson.

  1. Which of the ten questions could our team answer most confidently, and why is that one clearer than the others?
  2. Where did we discover disagreement about whether we could answer a question, and what does that disagreement tell us?
  3. Who beyond the treasurer needs to be comfortable reading the Stewardship Nsites financial dashboard?
  4. What is the cost, in decision quality, of continuing to operate with our current level of visibility?

Practice

Applied exercise — produces the Ten Financial Questions Visibility Test.

Ten Financial Questions Visibility Test

Establish an honest baseline of what leadership currently can and cannot answer about the church's finances, and assign ownership for closing each gap.

Estimated time: 40 minutes

Participants: Pastor, treasurer, finance committee, and one or two board members

Artifact produced: Ten Financial Questions Visibility Test

Required inputs

  • • Three months of statements from the Stewardship Nsites financial dashboard
  • • Most recent bank reconciliation
  • • List of who currently has access to financial reports

Instructions

  1. Read each of the ten financial questions aloud one at a time.
  2. Have each participant privately score the church's ability to answer as can-answer, partially, or cannot-answer.
  3. Compare scores as a group and discuss any disagreement.
  4. For every gap, name whether it is a missing report, a missing habit, or missing access.
  5. Assign a named owner and a target date to close each gap.
  6. Record the final consensus score for each question on the worksheet. Complete it online
  7. Summarize the overall visibility score to carry into the module scorecard.
Complete it online

Ten Financial Questions Visibility Test

  • Church name: ______________________
  • Date of review: ______________________
  • Facilitator: ______________________
Financial questionCurrent answer statusType of gapOwnerTarget close date
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     
     

Worked example

A fully completed sample using a fictional church. This is illustrative teaching material, not any church's actual data.

Northgate Community Church (illustrative example — not actual church data)

Northgate Community Church is a fictional congregation of about 220 attendees used here to illustrate what a completed visibility test looks like.

Financial questionCurrent answer statusType of gapOwnerTarget close date
What is our current cash balance?Can answerNone — habit already existsTreasurer, Maria O.Already met
What is our operating runway in months?Cannot answerMissing reportFinance chair, Dale R.In 3 weeks
How does this month compare to budget?PartiallyMissing habit of monthly reviewTreasurer, Maria O.In 4 weeks

How this leadership team reasoned

  • • Northgate's leadership realized the treasurer knew the cash balance but no one had ever calculated runway against average monthly expenses of roughly $38,000, an illustrative figure used only for this example.
  • • The board recognized that budget-to-actual comparison existed on paper but was never discussed in meetings, so it functioned as a report rather than a decision tool.

Decisions recorded

  • • Dale R. was assigned to calculate operating runway using the last six months of Stewardship Nsites statements and bring the figure to the next finance meeting.
  • • The board added a standing five-minute budget-versus-actual review to every monthly meeting agenda going forward.

Completed artifact extract — Ten Financial Questions Visibility Test

Visibility score: 6 of 10 questions answered with confidence. Two gaps stem from missing reports, two from missing habits. All four gaps have named owners and target dates within four weeks.

Illustrative exercise score: 17 of 20. Northgate's team was thorough and honest in scoring, connected each gap to a clear cause, and assigned realistic owners, though the runway calculation itself had not yet been completed at the time of scoring.

Score

Transparent 20-point exercise rubric: four criteria rated 0 to 5 with observable anchors.

Criterion0 — not evident3 — acceptable5 — exemplarySample
Completeness (0–5)Fewer than half of the ten questions were scored or discussed.All ten questions were scored, but some gap types were left blank.All ten questions were scored with a gap type, owner and target date for every gap.5
Use of evidence (0–5)Scores were guessed without checking any Stewardship Nsites report.Some scores referenced actual statements, others were assumed.Every score was checked against the actual Stewardship Nsites dashboard or statements before being finalized.4
Alignment to the module purpose (0–5)The exercise treated visibility as a compliance checkbox unrelated to decision-making.The exercise named gaps but did not connect them to future decisions.The exercise explicitly connected each gap to the kind of decision it currently prevents leadership from making well.4
Actionability and ownership (0–5)No owners or dates were assigned to any gap.Owners were assigned but dates were vague or missing.Every gap has a specific, named owner and a realistic target date.4
Worked sample total17 / 20
  • Completeness: Northgate scored all ten questions and documented a gap type, owner, and date for each identified gap.
  • Use of evidence: Most scores were verified against statements, though the runway question was scored on the honest admission that no figure existed yet.
  • Alignment to the module purpose: The team connected the runway gap to staffing-decision risk, though fewer connections were drawn for the budget-review gap.
  • Actionability and ownership: Every gap has a named owner and a specific date, though one date was set aggressively at three weeks for a task requiring six months of data.

Lesson-exercise scores (20 points each) demonstrate learning and artifact quality. They do not automatically overwrite the official Nine M module assessment, which remains a separate 100-point rating of five module dimensions.

Submit evidence

What must be submitted for this lesson to count as complete.

Submit

  • • Completed Ten Financial Questions Visibility Test worksheet with all gaps, owners, and dates recorded

Attach this evidence

  • Consensus scores for all ten questions
  • At least two access or habit changes committed to in writing

File upload is not implemented in this prototype. Ticking a box records that the church can produce the document; it does not store a file.

Contribute to official outcome

How this lesson builds the Church Financial Health and Stewardship Plan.

Artifact produced: Ten Financial Questions Visibility Test

Feeds the reporting-reliability score and opening scorecard section of the Church Financial Health and Stewardship Plan.

Open the module deliverable assembly

Participant reflection and notes

Which financial question, if I could answer it confidently tomorrow, would change a decision I am currently avoiding?