I.M.P.A.C.T. Church Empowerment Program

A partnership with Pastor Lee Jenkins, the Stewardship Coach, and Allan Bell - CPA, CMA, MBA, Nsites founder and creator

Nine M Academy Back to NsitesDemo data

Participant digital workbook

Study all nine Ms, reflect on what they mean for your church, complete each exercise, assess current practice and prepare your contribution to the church's shared work.

Digital workbook OR-NM-1.0 (prototype) · Nine M curriculum version 1.0

Demo data

Your progress through the workbook

9 assigned modules, four lessons each, with a rated self-assessment and a 90-day plan per module.

Entries save as you type (this session only)

0 of 36 exercises written · 0 of 45 areas rated (0%)

Printed edition & print previewCompiled church results

Every activity in the printed workbook can be completed here online. Your answers stay saved under your name, and the downloads give you the same complete workbook on paper.

M1 — Mission (module 1 of 9)

Define why the church exists, whom it is called to serve, what makes it distinctive, where it is going, and which priorities should govern decisions.

Page 1 of 90 of 5 areas rated

What this module produces

Mission and Strategic Identity Brief

  • Sharpened mission statement distinguished from the universal church purpose and the church's activity list
  • Church Fingerprint Statement naming the gifts, experience, assets, relationships and demonstrated impact unique to this congregation
  • Community and Priority-Audience Profile drawing on demographic, psychographic, relational and ministry information
  • Alignment and Opportunity Analysis comparing community needs to current ministry activity
  • Three-year vision statement approved by leadership
  • Three to five twelve-month priorities, each with a named owner and a success measure
  • Leadership Alignment Record documenting where the team agrees and where it does not yet agree
  • Mission Decision Filter leadership commits to applying to new ministry opportunities and requests
  • Documented gaps between the current mission language and the church's lived, observable practice
  • 90-day action plan naming who closes each gap, by when, and how progress will be reviewed

Objectives

  • Distinguish universal purpose, local mission and activity lists
  • Name the church's distinctive fingerprint from evidence
  • Understand the community and priority audience
  • Translate mission into measurable priorities and a decision filter

4 weeks · about 6 hours of leadership time

  1. Lesson 1: From Doing Church to Living the Mission

    What you will learn: Distinguish a universal church purpose, a distinctive local mission, and a list of activities.

    75 minutes · Senior pastor, executive/associate pastors, board or elder team, ministry directors

    Scripture lens — Habakkuk 2:2

    2 And the LORD answered me, and said, Write the vision, and make it plain upon tables, that he may run that readeth it.

    King James Version (KJV) · Public domain

    This passage's instruction to 'write the vision and make it plain' is offered as a frame for why mission clarity must be written down and shared, not simply understood informally by leadership.

    Materials and evidence you will use

    • Current mission or purpose statement (if one exists)
    • Most recent ministry calendar or activity list
    • Any prior strategic plan or vision document
    • Individual worksheets from each participating leader
    • Notes from the group discussion of divergent answers

    By the end of this lesson, you should be able to

    • Leaders can state, in one sentence each, the difference between universal purpose, local mission and activity list.
    • Each leader completes all seven Mission Clarity questions independently before any group discussion.
    • The group produces a Leadership Alignment Map showing where answers converge and diverge.
    • Leadership names at least two current activities that do not clearly serve the stated mission.

    Study reading

    Understand the concept

    Your work in this lesson focuses on this outcome: Distinguish a universal church purpose, a distinctive local mission, and a list of activities.

    A mission statement that could describe any church has not yet done its job; today's exercise exists to find the honest starting point this specific congregation is working from.

    Why it matters for your church

    Ministries that cannot be tied to the mission in one sentence often consume disproportionate volunteer energy and budget.

    New leaders and staff who are never walked through this distinction tend to default to running whatever activities they inherited.

    Unspoken disagreement about mission among leadership eventually surfaces as conflict over budget or staffing priorities.

    Examine the evidence

    Use Current mission or purpose statement (if one exists), Most recent ministry calendar or activity list, and Any prior strategic plan or vision document to compare your church's present practice with its stated intentions. Look for documented patterns, missing information, and differences between what people assume and what the evidence supports.

    Your completed work should be supported by Individual worksheets from each participating leader, and Notes from the group discussion of divergent answers. Record uncertainty honestly so your team knows what still needs to be verified.

    Prepare for the shared exercise

    To surface each leader's honest, independent understanding of the church's mission before group discussion, and to document where the team currently agrees and disagrees. The Seven Mission Clarity Questions and Alignment Mapping produces the Leadership Alignment Map, which contributes to the module's principal deliverable.

    Before working with your team, consider this reflection: Before the next session, write privately: if a new volunteer asked you why this church exists, what would you actually say, and does it match what the group recorded today?

    Key terms

    • Universal purpose: The calling shared by every Christian church, regardless of location, size or tradition.
    • Local mission: The specific expression of the universal purpose that this particular congregation is called to live out in its context.
    • Activity list: The current programs and ministries a church runs, which may or may not clearly serve its stated mission.
    • Leadership Alignment Map: A visual or tabular record of where leaders' independent mission answers converge and diverge.

    Failure patterns to avoid

    • Skipping the independent-answer step and moving straight to group discussion, which produces polite agreement rather than honest data.
    • Adopting a mission statement copied from another church's website without adapting it to this congregation's actual context.
    • Treating this as a one-time exercise rather than revisiting alignment as leadership changes over time.

    Ministry case — Riverside Fellowship's Quiet Drift

    Riverside Fellowship (illustrative example) had operated for eleven years with a mission statement about 'reaching people for Christ' printed on the bulletin every week. When the elder team finally sat down and answered seven independent Mission Clarity questions, five of six elders described completely different priority audiences: two named young families, one named the elderly widowed population near the church, one named unchurched neighbors within walking distance, and two gave no specific answer at all.

    The resulting Leadership Alignment Map made the gap impossible to ignore. Rather than treating the divergence as a crisis, the team used it as the starting point for a focused three-month process to name a local mission specific enough to actually guide decisions, beginning with an honest look at which of their eight current ministries served which audience.

    Lesson takeaway: A mission statement that could describe any church has not yet done its job; today's exercise exists to find the honest starting point this specific congregation is working from.

    Exercise — Seven Mission Clarity Questions and Alignment Mapping (produces: Leadership Alignment Map)

    To surface each leader's honest, independent understanding of the church's mission before group discussion, and to document where the team currently agrees and disagrees.

    1. Distribute one Mission Clarity worksheet to each participant and ask them not to confer with one another yet. Complete it online
    2. Have each leader answer all seven questions independently in writing, allowing roughly 15 minutes.
    3. Collect or display each leader's answers to each question, one question at a time.
    4. For each question, transcribe the range of answers onto the shared Leadership Alignment Map worksheet. Complete it online
    5. Mark each question as 'aligned,' 'partially aligned,' or 'divergent' based on how closely answers matched.
    6. Facilitate open discussion on each divergent question, recording the reasoning behind different answers.
    7. Identify the two or three gaps the team agrees are most urgent to resolve before the next lesson.

    Worksheet columns: Mission Clarity question · Leader responses (summarized) · Alignment level · Notes and follow-up needed

    Complete it online

    Leadership Alignment Map

    Complete the Leadership Alignment Map here. Your answers are kept under your name and are waiting for you when you return.

    Saves as you type
    Leadership Alignment Map
    #Mission Clarity questionLeader responses (summarized)Alignment levelNotes and follow-up needed
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    Saving keeps it private to you; submitting shares it with your coach and church panel.
    My submission portal
    Worked sample — Riverside Fellowship (illustrative example — not actual church data) (illustrative, scored 17/20)

    Riverside Fellowship's six elders completed the seven Mission Clarity questions independently during a Saturday morning session before comparing answers as a group.

    Leadership Alignment Map, Riverside Fellowship: of seven Mission Clarity questions, two showed strong alignment (what would be lost, current activity clarity), one showed partial alignment (why we exist), and four showed clear divergence (priority audience, distinctiveness, one-sentence mission, root disagreements). Priority gap for immediate follow-up: naming a specific priority audience and a distinctive local expression of mission.

    • Elders agreed to postpone finalizing new mission language until the community profile (Lesson 3) and fingerprint statement (Lesson 2) were complete.
    • Elders assigned two members to review all eight current ministries against the honest answers surfaced today, ahead of the next session.

    The map is complete across all seven questions with specific, attributable responses and a clear next step identified, though the one-sentence mission answers were not yet synthesized into a single working draft.

    Discussion prompts

    • Which of the seven questions produced the widest disagreement among leaders, and why do you think that is?
    • Name one current activity that, honestly, does not clearly serve the mission as leadership just described it.
    • What would change about how we run the next leadership meeting if everyone in the room agreed on the mission in writing?
    • Who outside this room needs to see today's results, and how should we introduce that conversation?

    Reflection: Before the next session, write privately: if a new volunteer asked you why this church exists, what would you actually say, and does it match what the group recorded today?

    Use these prompts to prepare your own response before the group discussion. Honest differences help the church identify where further work is needed.

    Completion standard — tick what you can produce

    Rolls into the module deliverable: Feeds directly into the Leadership Alignment Record section of the Mission and Strategic Identity Brief.

  2. Lesson 2: Discovering the Church's Fingerprint

    What you will learn: Identify the combination of gifts, experience, assets, relationships and demonstrated impact that makes the church distinctive.

    90 minutes · Senior pastor, associate staff, ministry directors, at least two long-tenured lay leaders

    Scripture lens — 1 Corinthians 12:4-6

    4 Now there are diversities of gifts, but the same Spirit. 5 And there are differences of administrations, but the same Lord. 6 And there are diversities of operations, but it is the same God which worketh all in all.

    King James Version (KJV) · Public domain

    This passage's language of varied gifts, service and workings within one body is offered as a frame for why a church's distinctiveness is legitimately grounded in its particular combination of people and gifts, not a generic template.

    Materials and evidence you will use

    • Staff and volunteer gift/skills inventory, if one exists
    • Facilities and asset list
    • List of current community partnerships or relationships
    • Supporting documentation cited for each inventory item
    • Sign-off from at least two long-tenured leaders confirming accuracy

    By the end of this lesson, you should be able to

    • Leadership names at least three specific gifts or competencies unique to this congregation's staff and volunteer base.
    • Leadership inventories at least two tangible assets and two significant relationships that shape ministry capacity.
    • The group produces a documented Church Fingerprint Statement grounded in specific evidence, not generic language.
    • At least one past outcome is cited as demonstrated impact supporting the fingerprint.

    Study reading

    Understand the concept

    Your work in this lesson focuses on this outcome: Identify the combination of gifts, experience, assets, relationships and demonstrated impact that makes the church distinctive.

    A church's distinctiveness is usually already present in its people, its building and its history; the work today is noticing it clearly enough to write it down and use it.

    Why it matters for your church

    A documented fingerprint helps new ministry proposals get evaluated against real strengths rather than the pastor's current enthusiasm.

    Underused assets, once named specifically, often reveal quick opportunities for new ministry with little added cost.

    Long-standing partnerships that go undocumented are at risk of being lost when the leader who built them moves on or retires.

    Examine the evidence

    Use Staff and volunteer gift/skills inventory, if one exists, Facilities and asset list, and List of current community partnerships or relationships to compare your church's present practice with its stated intentions. Look for documented patterns, missing information, and differences between what people assume and what the evidence supports.

    Your completed work should be supported by Supporting documentation cited for each inventory item, and Sign-off from at least two long-tenured leaders confirming accuracy. Record uncertainty honestly so your team knows what still needs to be verified.

    Prepare for the shared exercise

    To inventory specific gifts, assets, relationships and demonstrated impact, and synthesize them into a documented statement of the church's distinctiveness. The Church Fingerprint Inventory and Statement Drafting produces the Church Fingerprint Statement, which contributes to the module's principal deliverable.

    Before working with your team, consider this reflection: Before the next session, ask one person outside leadership what they believe makes this church different, and note whether their answer matches today's fingerprint statement.

    Key terms

    • Church fingerprint: The unique combination of gifts, experience, assets, relationships and demonstrated impact that distinguishes one congregation from another.
    • Demonstrated impact: Specific, evidenced outcomes a church has produced, as opposed to aspirational claims about what it hopes to accomplish.
    • Asset inventory: A documented list of tangible resources such as facilities, equipment or land available to support ministry.

    Failure patterns to avoid

    • Writing a fingerprint statement using generic strengths language that would apply equally to most churches in the area.
    • Overlooking gifts and relationships that have become invisible to leadership through years of familiarity.
    • Claiming demonstrated impact without being able to point to any specific, evidenced outcome.

    Ministry case — Northgate Community Church's Overlooked Kitchen

    Northgate Community Church (illustrative example — not actual church data) had operated a full commercial kitchen for nine years, used almost exclusively for the annual chili cook-off fundraiser. During the fingerprint exercise, a lay leader mentioned almost in passing that the church's food pantry coordinator had spent fourteen years as a hospital dietitian before retiring.

    That combination, an underused commercial kitchen and a staff volunteer with professional nutrition training, had never been named as part of the church's identity. Once documented in the fingerprint statement, it became the seed for a new community meal-prep ministry the following year, built on capacity the church already had rather than a resource it needed to acquire.

    Lesson takeaway: A church's distinctiveness is usually already present in its people, its building and its history; the work today is noticing it clearly enough to write it down and use it.

    Exercise — Church Fingerprint Inventory and Statement Drafting (produces: Church Fingerprint Statement)

    To inventory specific gifts, assets, relationships and demonstrated impact, and synthesize them into a documented statement of the church's distinctiveness.

    1. Divide the whiteboard or worksheet into four categories: gifts and experience, assets, relationships, demonstrated impact. Complete it online
    2. As a group, brainstorm at least four specific items in each category, pushing past the first easy answers.
    3. For each item, note the specific evidence supporting it, such as a name, a date, or an outcome.
    4. Identify the two or three items in each category that are most distinctive, meaning few other churches nearby could claim them.
    5. Draft a two- to three-sentence Church Fingerprint Statement combining the strongest items across categories.
    6. Read the draft aloud and ask long-tenured members whether it matches the church's actual history.
    7. Revise the statement until the room agrees it is specific, evidenced and true rather than aspirational.

    Worksheet columns: Category · Specific item · Supporting evidence · Distinctiveness (why few churches nearby could claim this)

    Complete it online

    Church Fingerprint Inventory

    Complete the Church Fingerprint Statement here. Your answers are kept under your name and are waiting for you when you return.

    Saves as you type
    Church Fingerprint Inventory
    #CategorySpecific itemSupporting evidenceDistinctiveness (why few churches nearby could claim this)
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    Saving keeps it private to you; submitting shares it with your coach and church panel.
    My submission portal
    Worked sample — Northgate Community Church (illustrative example — not actual church data) (illustrative, scored 18/20)

    Northgate's leadership team, including two long-tenured deacons, completed the fingerprint inventory during a Thursday evening planning session.

    Church Fingerprint Statement, Northgate Community Church: Northgate is a congregation whose distinctive combination of a fully equipped commercial kitchen, a professionally trained nutrition volunteer, and a twelve-year school partnership positions it to serve documented and growing food and literacy needs in its immediate neighborhood, evidenced by a 60 percent increase in pantry usage and an 85 percent improvement rate among tutored students over the past three years.

    • Leadership approved drafting a new community meal-prep ministry proposal built on the kitchen and dietitian combination for the next planning cycle.
    • Leadership assigned the facilities team to explore options for the unused 1.5 acres within the next two ministry planning cycles.

    The inventory is thorough across all four categories with specific, documented evidence, and the resulting statement is concrete and defensible rather than generic.

    Discussion prompts

    • Which gift or asset named today surprised you because it had gone unnoticed for so long?
    • Which of our current relationships took the longest to build, and what would it take to replace it if it were lost?
    • Does our draft fingerprint statement describe who we actually are, or who we wish we were?
    • What is one underused asset we could put to better use within the next ninety days?

    Reflection: Before the next session, ask one person outside leadership what they believe makes this church different, and note whether their answer matches today's fingerprint statement.

    Use these prompts to prepare your own response before the group discussion. Honest differences help the church identify where further work is needed.

    Completion standard — tick what you can produce

    Rolls into the module deliverable: Feeds directly into the church distinctiveness section of the Mission and Strategic Identity Brief.

  3. Lesson 3: Understanding the Community and Priority Audience

    What you will learn: Use demographic, psychographic, relational and ministry information to understand the people the church is positioned to serve.

    75 minutes · Senior pastor, ministry directors, outreach or missions leaders, at least one member active in community relationships

    Scripture lens — Acts 17:22-27

    22 Then Paul stood in the midst of Mars’ hill, and said, Ye men of Athens, I perceive that in all things ye are too superstitious. 23 For as I passed by, and beheld your devotions, I found an altar with this inscription, TO THE UNKNOWN GOD. Whom therefore ye ignorantly worship, him declare I unto you. 24 God that made the world and all things therein, seeing that he is Lord of heaven and earth, dwelleth not in temples made with hands; 25 Neither is worshipped with men’s hands, as though he needed any thing, seeing he giveth to all life, and breath, and all things; 26 And hath made of one blood all nations of men for to dwell on all the face of the earth, and hath determined the times before appointed, and the bounds of their habitation; 27 That they should seek the Lord, if haply they might feel after him, and find him, though he be not far from every one of us:

    King James Version (KJV) · Public domain

    Paul's careful observation of Athens before he ever spoke is offered as a model for why leadership should study its community closely before assuming what it needs.

    Materials and evidence you will use

    • Local demographic data (census tract, school district or municipal reports)
    • Prior Church Fingerprint Statement from Lesson 2
    • Current ministry activity list
    • Source citations for demographic data used
    • Outreach team notes supporting psychographic and relational entries

    By the end of this lesson, you should be able to

    • Leadership documents at least three demographic facts about the surrounding community from a credible source.
    • Leadership identifies psychographic and relational patterns beyond raw demographic data.
    • The group names a specific priority audience the church's fingerprint positions it to serve well.
    • The group produces an Alignment and Opportunity Analysis comparing community need to current ministry activity.

    Study reading

    Understand the community as it is today

    Demographic information helps you see who actually lives around your church today. Review age distribution, household composition, income levels, and changes during the last five to ten years. Compare the evidence with the picture you previously held of the neighborhood and note what surprises you.

    Psychographic and relational information adds what reports often cannot show: what neighbors worry about, where they gather, barriers to church participation, and existing relationships of trust. Draw on specific observations from people who know the community well, and distinguish evidence from general impressions.

    If formal sources are dated or incomplete, gather current evidence through conversations with local schools and community organizations or through a careful walk of nearby streets. Current, imperfect evidence is usually more useful than polished information that no longer describes the neighborhood.

    Connect evidence to mission

    A priority audience identifies where your church's distinctive gifts and the community's documented needs overlap most clearly. It guides new energy and decisions without suggesting that anyone else is unwelcome or unimportant.

    Compare each documented need with current ministry activity. Mark where the response is strong, partial, or absent, and resist softening a genuine gap simply because the conclusion is uncomfortable. This comparison becomes the Alignment and Opportunity Analysis used in the next lesson.

    Key terms

    • Demographic information: Measurable population characteristics such as age, income and household composition.
    • Psychographic information: Attitudes, concerns, values and lifestyle patterns of people in the community, typically gathered through observation and relationship.
    • Priority audience: The specific group of people the church's fingerprint and the community's need most clearly position it to serve well.
    • Alignment and Opportunity Analysis: A comparison of community need against current ministry activity that reveals matches, partial matches and unmet gaps.

    Failure patterns to avoid

    • Relying only on formal demographic data and skipping the relational and psychographic conversation that reveals real barriers to participation.
    • Naming a priority audience so broad it fails to guide any actual decision.
    • Conducting the alignment analysis but avoiding the honest conclusion that a beloved ministry does not serve the named audience.

    Ministry case — Cedar Valley Chapel's Changing Neighborhood

    Cedar Valley Chapel (illustrative example — not actual church data) had run a strong youth ministry for over a decade, built around the assumption that its neighborhood was full of families with school-age children, as it had been twenty years earlier. When leadership pulled current school district enrollment data during this exercise, they discovered the neighborhood's school-age population had declined by nearly a third, while the population of adults over sixty-five within a two-mile radius had grown substantially.

    Rather than abandoning the youth ministry immediately, leadership used the Alignment and Opportunity Analysis to name a second, growing priority audience alongside it: isolated older adults, many of whom had no family living nearby. This led to a modest but well-targeted new visitation and transportation ministry, launched using volunteers who were already gifted for exactly that kind of relational work, identified in the previous session's fingerprint exercise.

    Lesson takeaway: A mission is only as useful as the specific people it is aimed at; today's work replaces assumptions about the neighborhood with real information and a named priority audience.

    Exercise — Community Profile and Alignment and Opportunity Analysis (produces: Alignment and Opportunity Analysis)

    To document current community demographic, psychographic and relational information and compare it honestly against current ministry activity to reveal alignment and gaps.

    1. Record at least four demographic facts about the surrounding community from a credible source.
    2. Record at least three psychographic or relational observations from outreach leaders or community-connected members.
    3. Referencing the Church Fingerprint Statement, draft one specific priority audience description.
    4. List the priority audience's most pressing needs, drawn from the demographic and relational information gathered.
    5. For each need, identify whether a current ministry fully addresses it, partially addresses it, or does not address it.
    6. Mark each row as a strong alignment, a partial alignment, or an opportunity gap.
    7. Select the top two opportunity gaps to carry into the next lesson's priority-setting work.

    Worksheet columns: Priority audience need · Supporting community data · Current ministry response · Alignment status (strong / partial / gap)

    Complete it online

    Alignment and Opportunity Analysis

    Complete the Alignment and Opportunity Analysis here. Your answers are kept under your name and are waiting for you when you return.

    Saves as you type
    Alignment and Opportunity Analysis
    #Priority audience needSupporting community dataCurrent ministry responseAlignment status (strong / partial / gap)
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    8
    Saving keeps it private to you; submitting shares it with your coach and church panel.
    My submission portal
    Worked sample — Cedar Valley Chapel (illustrative example — not actual church data) (illustrative, scored 17/20)

    Cedar Valley's leadership pulled current school district enrollment figures and county aging-population data, combined with two months of informal conversations logged by the outreach team.

    Alignment and Opportunity Analysis, Cedar Valley Chapel: of six priority-audience needs assessed, two show strong alignment (youth mentorship, after-school tutoring), two show partial alignment (senior relational contact, affordable meals), and two represent clear opportunity gaps (senior transportation, digital literacy support). Top priority for the next twelve months: senior transportation and visitation, aligned to existing relational gifts identified in the church fingerprint.

    • Leadership approved developing a senior transportation and visitation ministry as the top opportunity gap to address in the next twelve months.
    • Leadership tabled the digital literacy gap for future consideration, noting it would require volunteer training not currently available.

    The analysis is grounded in specific data sources and produces a clear, evidenced priority decision, though the digital literacy gap was named but not fully explored for feasibility.

    Discussion prompts

    • What surprised you most about the demographic data compared to your prior assumptions about the neighborhood?
    • What relational or psychographic barrier did we name today that a spreadsheet alone would never reveal?
    • Which current ministry showed the weakest alignment with our named priority audience?
    • What would it take to responsibly redirect resources toward the strongest opportunity gap we identified?

    Reflection: Before the next session, spend fifteen minutes in the neighborhood immediately around the church building and note one observation that either confirms or challenges today's priority audience description.

    Use these prompts to prepare your own response before the group discussion. Honest differences help the church identify where further work is needed.

    Completion standard — tick what you can produce

    Rolls into the module deliverable: Feeds directly into the Community and Priority-Audience Profile section of the Mission and Strategic Identity Brief.

  4. Lesson 4: Turning Mission into Strategic Direction

    What you will learn: Translate mission into measurable priorities and a repeatable decision filter.

    90 minutes · Senior pastor, executive/associate pastors, board or elder team, ministry directors

    Scripture lens — Nehemiah 2:17-18

    17 Then said I unto them, Ye see the distress that we are in, how Jerusalem lieth waste, and the gates thereof are burned with fire: come, and let us build up the wall of Jerusalem, that we be no more a reproach. 18 Then I told them of the hand of my God which was good upon me; as also the king’s words that he had spoken unto me. And they said, Let us rise up and build. So they strengthened their hands for this good work.

    King James Version (KJV) · Public domain

    Nehemiah's move from surveying the broken wall to declaring 'let us rise up and build' is offered as a model for the shift this lesson asks leadership to make, from understanding to committed direction.

    Materials and evidence you will use

    • Leadership Alignment Map from Lesson 1
    • Church Fingerprint Statement from Lesson 2
    • Alignment and Opportunity Analysis from Lesson 3
    • Direct traceability notes linking each priority to Lesson 1, 2 or 3 findings
    • Sign-off from board chair or equivalent governing body representative

    By the end of this lesson, you should be able to

    • Leadership drafts and approves a three-year vision statement grounded in the mission, fingerprint and priority audience work of the prior three lessons.
    • Leadership names three to five twelve-month priorities, each with an owner and a success measure.
    • The group builds a Mission Decision Filter that can be applied consistently to future ministry proposals.
    • Leadership identifies remaining gaps and drafts a 90-day action plan to close them.

    Study reading

    Understand the concept

    Your work in this lesson focuses on this outcome: Translate mission into measurable priorities and a repeatable decision filter.

    Mission clarity only becomes useful once it is translated into a small number of owned priorities and a filter leadership will actually apply the next time a hard decision arrives.

    Why it matters for your church

    Without a decision filter, new ministry proposals are evaluated inconsistently, often based on who is asking rather than whether the proposal fits the mission.

    A twelve-month priority list with too many items functions the same as having no priorities at all.

    A gaps list that never becomes a dated action plan tends to be revisited, unresolved, in the same form a year later.

    Examine the evidence

    Use Leadership Alignment Map from Lesson 1, Church Fingerprint Statement from Lesson 2, and Alignment and Opportunity Analysis from Lesson 3 to compare your church's present practice with its stated intentions. Look for documented patterns, missing information, and differences between what people assume and what the evidence supports.

    Your completed work should be supported by Direct traceability notes linking each priority to Lesson 1, 2 or 3 findings, and Sign-off from board chair or equivalent governing body representative. Record uncertainty honestly so your team knows what still needs to be verified.

    Prepare for the shared exercise

    To translate three lessons of mission, fingerprint and community analysis into a concrete three-year vision, a short list of owned annual priorities, a reusable decision filter, and a dated action plan. The Vision, Priorities, Decision Filter and 90-Day Plan produces the Three-year vision, twelve-month priorities and Mission Decision Filter, which contributes to the module's principal deliverable.

    Before working with your team, consider this reflection: In the next 90 days, watch for the first real ministry proposal that arrives and note, honestly, whether leadership actually applied the new Mission Decision Filter to it or reverted to old habits.

    Key terms

    • Three-year vision: A short, vivid description of the future state leadership is pursuing over the next three years, grounded in mission, fingerprint and priority audience.
    • Twelve-month priorities: Three to five specific, owned and measurable steps toward the three-year vision, chosen from among many possible good ideas.
    • Mission Decision Filter: A short, repeatable set of questions leadership applies to new ministry proposals to test alignment with mission, fingerprint and current priorities.
    • 90-day action plan: A near-term schedule of specific actions, owners, due dates and review dates for closing the gaps identified across the module.

    Failure patterns to avoid

    • Writing a three-year vision as a list of programs rather than a description of a future state for the people the church serves.
    • Approving more than five twelve-month priorities because leadership could not bring itself to say no to good ideas.
    • Building a decision filter so vague that any proposal could pass it, defeating its purpose.

    Ministry case — Cedar Valley Chapel Turns Analysis Into Direction

    Cedar Valley Chapel (illustrative example — not actual church data), continuing from the previous session's opportunity analysis, used this final lesson to translate its senior transportation and visitation finding into an actual twelve-month priority. Leadership named a specific owner, the associate pastor of care ministries, and a measurable target: a working transportation ministry serving at least twenty seniors monthly by the end of the year, launched with the deacons who had already shown relational gifts for this kind of work.

    When a well-meaning member later proposed launching an entirely new coffee-shop outreach concept requiring significant capital investment, leadership applied its new Mission Decision Filter and recognized the proposal, while appealing, did not draw on the church's documented fingerprint and would compete directly for the same limited volunteer hours needed for the senior transportation launch. The proposal was tabled respectfully, with a specific explanation tied to the filter rather than a vague deferral.

    Lesson takeaway: Mission clarity only becomes useful once it is translated into a small number of owned priorities and a filter leadership will actually apply the next time a hard decision arrives.

    Exercise — Vision, Priorities, Decision Filter and 90-Day Plan (produces: Three-year vision, twelve-month priorities and Mission Decision Filter)

    To translate three lessons of mission, fingerprint and community analysis into a concrete three-year vision, a short list of owned annual priorities, a reusable decision filter, and a dated action plan.

    1. As a group, draft a three-year vision statement describing a future state, not a list of programs.
    2. Test the vision against the fingerprint and priority audience work from Lessons 2 and 3, and revise as needed.
    3. Select three to five twelve-month priorities directly from the opportunity gaps and alignment gaps already documented.
    4. Assign a specific owner and a measurable success indicator to each twelve-month priority.
    5. Draft four to six Mission Decision Filter questions in plain, usable language.
    6. Test the filter against one hypothetical ministry proposal and revise if it fails to produce a clear answer.
    7. List remaining gaps and complete a 90-day action plan with an action, owner, due date, resources, success measure, status and review date for each.

    Worksheet columns: Action · Owner · Due date · Resources required · Success measure · Status · Review date

    Complete it online

    90-Day Action Plan

    Complete the Three-year vision, twelve-month priorities and Mission Decision Filter here. Your answers are kept under your name and are waiting for you when you return.

    Saves as you type
    90-Day Action Plan
    #ActionOwnerDue dateResources requiredSuccess measureStatusReview date
    1
    2
    3
    4
    5
    6
    7
    Saving keeps it private to you; submitting shares it with your coach and church panel.
    My submission portal
    Worked sample — Cedar Valley Chapel (illustrative example — not actual church data) (illustrative, scored 18/20)

    Cedar Valley's leadership team built on the prior three lessons' artifacts to complete its 90-day action plan during the final planning session.

    Three-Year Vision, Cedar Valley Chapel: within three years, Cedar Valley will be recognized in its immediate neighborhood as the church that no isolated older adult has to face alone, sustained by a fully trained volunteer transportation and visitation network and a renewed, right-sized youth ministry serving its smaller but steady population of families. Twelve-Month Priorities: 1) launch senior transportation and visitation ministry serving twenty seniors monthly; 2) finalize and distribute the Mission Decision Filter to all ministry leaders; 3) resolve remaining leadership disagreement on priority audience language; 4) verify and document fingerprint claims flagged in Lesson 2; 5) evaluate feasibility of a digital literacy ministry for seniors. Mission Decision Filter: does this proposal serve our named priority audience; does it draw on a gift or asset already in our fingerprint; does it advance one of this year's five priorities; what would have to be true for us to say no to this.

    • Leadership approved the senior transportation and visitation ministry as its top twelve-month priority, with the associate pastor of care ministries as owner.
    • Leadership set a formal board vote on the completed Mission and Strategic Identity Brief for week 13, giving a firm deadline to the entire module's work.

    The vision, priorities, filter and 90-day plan are specific, owned and dated, and each element traces directly back to evidence gathered in the three prior lessons.

    Discussion prompts

    • Does our three-year vision describe a future state for people we serve, or does it still read like a list of programs?
    • Which of our twelve-month priorities was hardest to agree on, and why?
    • Walk through a recent ministry decision: would our new Mission Decision Filter have changed the outcome?
    • Which item on our 90-day plan are you personally most concerned will slip if no one is watching it closely?

    Reflection: In the next 90 days, watch for the first real ministry proposal that arrives and note, honestly, whether leadership actually applied the new Mission Decision Filter to it or reverted to old habits.

    Use these prompts to prepare your own response before the group discussion. Honest differences help the church identify where further work is needed.

    Completion standard — tick what you can produce

    Rolls into the module deliverable: Completes the strategic direction section of the Mission and Strategic Identity Brief and provides the gaps and 90-day action plan required for module completion.

Rate this module

Rate each area from 0 to 4 as the church is today, not as you hope it will be.

  • 0 — Not Established: Nothing is in place for this area today.
  • 1 — Emerging: Something has been started but it is informal and inconsistent.
  • 2 — Developing: It works in parts of the church but is not documented or dependable.
  • 3 — Established: It is documented, consistently followed and reviewed.
  • 4 — Exemplary: It is a strength others could learn from, with evidence to prove it.
  1. 1. Mission Clarity

    Weighted 20% of the Mission score.

    What this represents: The mission statement is specific, distinct from the universal church purpose, and leadership can cite recent decisions shaped by it.

    Reference points for your rating

    0 — Not established:
    Leadership cannot articulate a mission distinct from a generic statement of Christian purpose; asked to describe the mission, different leaders give unrelated answers.
    2 — Developing:
    The mission statement names a specific local calling, but leadership has not tested it against activities to confirm the church is actually living it.
    4 — Exemplary:
    The mission statement is specific, memorable and consistently used as the filter for new ministry requests, budget requests and staffing decisions across the church.

    Use the closest reference point, then select 1 or 3 when your church falls between two descriptions.

  2. 2. Church Distinctiveness

    Weighted 20% of the Mission score.

    What this represents: A documented Church Fingerprint Statement names specific gifts, assets, relationships and demonstrated impact, and is referenced in planning conversations.

    Reference points for your rating

    0 — Not established:
    Leadership describes the church using language that could apply to almost any congregation in the area, with no documented fingerprint.
    2 — Developing:
    A draft Church Fingerprint Statement exists, but it has not been tested against actual outcomes or shared broadly with the congregation.
    4 — Exemplary:
    The Church Fingerprint Statement is well known throughout the congregation, shapes how new ministries are evaluated, and is revisited annually for accuracy.

    Use the closest reference point, then select 1 or 3 when your church falls between two descriptions.

  3. 3. Community Alignment

    Weighted 20% of the Mission score.

    What this represents: The profile is current, and leadership has completed an Alignment and Opportunity Analysis identifying where ministry matches or misses community need.

    Reference points for your rating

    0 — Not established:
    Leadership has no current data on the surrounding community and makes ministry decisions based on assumptions from years past.
    2 — Developing:
    A Community and Priority-Audience Profile has been drafted, but leadership has not yet compared it against current ministry activity.
    4 — Exemplary:
    The profile is refreshed on a regular cycle, actively drives ministry prioritization, and is referenced when new outreach opportunities are evaluated.

    Use the closest reference point, then select 1 or 3 when your church falls between two descriptions.

  4. 4. Leadership Alignment

    Weighted 20% of the Mission score.

    What this represents: The Leadership Alignment Record is current, disagreements have been named openly, and a plan exists to close remaining gaps.

    Reference points for your rating

    0 — Not established:
    Leaders have never compared their individual understandings of the mission; wide disagreement is likely but undocumented.
    2 — Developing:
    A Leadership Alignment Record has been created once, surfacing gaps, but no plan exists to close them.
    4 — Exemplary:
    Leadership revisits alignment on a regular rhythm, new leaders are onboarded into the mission explicitly, and alignment is visibly reflected in shared decision-making.

    Use the closest reference point, then select 1 or 3 when your church falls between two descriptions.

  5. 5. Strategic Translation

    Weighted 20% of the Mission score.

    What this represents: The three-year vision, twelve-month priorities and Mission Decision Filter are documented, owned and used in real planning conversations.

    Reference points for your rating

    0 — Not established:
    No vision or set of priorities exists beyond the current year's ministry calendar; mission language never translates into specific direction.
    2 — Developing:
    A three-year vision and a list of annual priorities have been drafted, but they lack owners, success measures or a decision filter.
    4 — Exemplary:
    Strategic priorities and the decision filter are actively applied to new opportunities, tracked against measures, and adjusted through an annual review process.

    Use the closest reference point, then select 1 or 3 when your church falls between two descriptions.

90-day plan for Mission

Name the first three moves, who owns each one and when it is due.

Completion checklist

  • • All four lessons marked complete
  • • All four exercises submitted
  • • Required evidence uploaded
  • • Named principal deliverable generated and approved
  • • 90-day action plan created with owners and dates
  • • Coach review recorded

0 of 4 exercises written · 0 of 5 areas rated

Pastor Lee Jenkins

1

Participant Workbook

Sample contents created by Allan Bell - CPA, CMA, MBA, for illustrative purposes.

What happens to these answers

Approval sits with people, not the software.

  • Individual answers are held for the coach. Church reporting, board packs and the printed workbook show compiled scores and themes only.
  • Nine M methodology, content, exercises and deliverables by Pastor Lee Jenkins.
  • Prototype: responses live in this browser session only. No invitations, emails or text messages are sent, and nothing is written to a server.

A partnership between Pastor Lee Jenkins, the Stewardship Coach, and Allan Bell - CPA, CMA, MBA, Nsites founder and creator.